star_icon

Author: Rahul Mulay

Posted On Jun 11, 2015   |   2 min

In my earlier blog, I shared about my views about outsourcing being all-pervasive.

I have been involved with tech outsourcing for more than 15 years, and have seen excellent value additions to a business through an outsourcing partnership and have also witnessed it failing. Based on my conversations with CXOs over the years, here are some of the reasons which I have realized contribute to a failed outsourcing partnership –

Choice of partner – In this case, the fault is on both sides. CEOs are not clear about their objectives for outsourcing and hence are unable to properly evaluate a potential partner and the partner’s ability to scale up. Outsourcing companies, on the other hand, overestimate their capabilities of handling a technology and project, or make false promises to bag the project, only to see the relationship fail soon after.

Unrealistic expectations – Irrespective of how many people you deploy, it will still take 9 months for the baby to be born

We vs They – The folks working on your project, though geographically separated are part of your team. The faster they are integrated with your team, the quicker you start achieving your outsourcing objectives.

Blame game – If something goes wrong, it is always the partner’s fault. That is not always the case. CEOs typically do not want to introspect on whether they personally or their team contributed to a failed relationship.

Communication – Over communication or the lack of it. Some CXOs want to tightly control the outsourced team and end up spending more time than necessary in communicating with them, leading to their bandwidth getting drained. Others, may not communicate at all, keeping the team guessing on whether they are on the right path or not.

Do these sound familiar? Are there more reasons?

Forward-Deployed Engineering

Additional Perspectives on the FDE Model

Forward-deployed engineering is gaining attention as a way to bring engineers closer to customer problems and real-world implementation. Several organizations describe this model as a way to align engineering work with customer needs, systems, and workflows. Here are a few resources that offer additional perspectives on the FDE model:https://www.griddynamics.com/glossary/forward-deployed-engineering

https://miragemetrics.com/guides/forward-deployed-engineering

https://www.cognizant.com/us/en/glossary/forward-deployed-engineer

https://fde.academy/blog

About Harbinger Group

Harbinger Group is a global Advisory-Led Performance Enablement company. For more than three decades, we’ve partnered with organizations in the people business, helping Enterprises, B2B SaaS vendors, and Digital Publishers close the gap between where workforce and learning performance is today and where it needs to be.
We work across Workforce Technology and Digital Learning domains. In each, we diagnose the friction limiting performance first, then engineer the fix, combining strategic advisory with digital product engineering and eLearning content development to deliver solutions built around the workflows, metrics, and outcomes each workforce owns.
Our pedigree in product engineering and digital learning has built a culture of continuous learning. We apply technologies like Agentic AI where they deliver measurable performance gains for our customers not because they’re new, but because they close the gap.

Why Harbinger is Your Trusted AI Solutions Partner?

line

30+

Years of Experience

1000+

Projects Delivered

500+

Technical Experts

115+

AI Engineers

100+

Happy Customers

15+

Successful AI Implementation Use Cases

200+

Apps and Platforms Integrated

30+

Product Innovation Awards